Thesis discussion conclusion

This is not good because the conclusion is a key part of the text and thesis writers really need to spend some time getting it right this is because the conclusion is the place where you argue that you have made a contribution to knowledge, where you show what it is, and where you discuss its implications. Page # list of figures, xxx list of tables introduction subheads methods subheads results subheads discussion subheads conclusion recommendations acknowledgments references appendices. Discussion, conclusions, recomendations, references, appendices, layout discussion the discussion is the key section of your thesis the purpose of the discussion is to explain the central results and potential implications of your study this is where you scrutinize your results and where the choice of method(s) is. Sections of the thesis in some disciplines, the results and discussion section are combined within the one chapter all theses have a biblio- graphy or reference list following the conclusion they may also have an appendix 1 research models and methods 2 developing a research proposal 3 thesis structure guidelines. If your thesis combines the two, use sub-headings to distinguish between them any points that have not been mentioned in the discussion section: your conclusions should be based only on points already raised references: it is quite unusual to include references in this section, as it is mainly a review of what has already.

Prioritize sections for the thesis or for an appendix interpretation/discussion interpret what you found justify your interpretation synthesize results in illustrations, tables, graphs, etc conclusions/implications/recommendations for future research for future practice report issues which were beyond the scope of this. It is similar, actually, to a paper's conclusion but lacks the conclusion's concern for broad implications and significance for a writer in the drafting stages, the thesis establishes a focus, a basis on which to include or exclude information for the reader of a finished product, the thesis anticipates the author's discussion. For instance, you will still want to ensure that your conclusion really does conclude, and does not just go off at a tangent to discuss something that is unrelated to the thesis some people believe (mistakenly) that a conclusion is the place for you to relax and 'say whatever you want' this is incorrect if you do. In a conventional thesis, what we call the imrad type (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion) the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all.

Regarding the number of pages, i would say 10-15 for a phd thesis 5 recommendations subrata chakraborty 4 years ago subrata chakraborty dibrugarh university very good discussion but regarding no of pages there seems to be no agreement i think as no of pages of conclusion should be kept at the minimum. When writing a dissertation or thesis, the results and discussion sections can be both the most interesting as well as the most challenging sections to write conclude by summarising the implications of your findings in brief, and explain why they are important for researchers and in practice, and provide some suggestions.

You will have already presented specific conclusions drawn from the results of each stage of your investigation in earlier chapters of your thesis in the discussion section of the thesis, you will have drawn some conclusions these can now be woven into a series of well organised conclusions of the work as a whole and. Writing your conclusion you may have been permitted, and have chosen, to include your conclusions in the discussion section, see our page on results and discussion for some ideas about why you might choose to do this however, it is normal practice to include a short section at the end of your dissertation that draws.

Since both the title and the conclusion contain the core conclusions or message of the thesis, it is a good idea to review your title at the same time that you finalise your conclusion chapter the title often contains two parts, although this is not obligatory the first part of the title contains. The conclusion should answer your research question(s) remember that a negative conclusion is also valid a summing up should repeat the most important issues raised in your thesis (particularly in the discussion), although preferably stated in a (slightly) different way for example, you could.

Thesis discussion conclusion
Rated 4/5 based on 47 review

Thesis discussion conclusion media

thesis discussion conclusion Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds yale clinical psychology professor susan nolen-hoeksema, phd and while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions. thesis discussion conclusion Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds yale clinical psychology professor susan nolen-hoeksema, phd and while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions. thesis discussion conclusion Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds yale clinical psychology professor susan nolen-hoeksema, phd and while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions. thesis discussion conclusion Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds yale clinical psychology professor susan nolen-hoeksema, phd and while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions. thesis discussion conclusion Fellow students, your adviser and your dissertation committee members can help provide that outside perspective, adds yale clinical psychology professor susan nolen-hoeksema, phd and while the discussion should put your research into context and tell a story, say experts, it should not overstate your conclusions.